Robert Steiner and his lectures on education
I do not know how many of you know about the works of this brilliant person that wrote so many wonderful things in the 20s.
The lecture I am referring to today was written in 1922 and it is a great example of in-depth analysis of understanding Antroposophy or Spiritual Science, that is the science that can help the teacher recognise in single concrete instances
the connection between body, soul and spirit in the child. I will offer you some interesting ideas taken from his lecture.
The teacher who lets the anthroposophic knowledge of man work upon
his thought and feeling, comes, as we have seen, to a kind of artistic
vision of the growing child, who is to him as individual, as full of
mystery and enigma, as is every great work of art. But this is not
all. Out of such a vision of the child proceeds also the manner in
which the lesson is handled, the actual art of teaching. Not that
the teacher consciously converts the knowledge of the child that he
has acquired — whether by study or by his own observation —
into educational formulae, into pedagogic maxims. The process is a
more instinctive one than that.
It must be admitted that, in spite of all the
experimental Psychology of the present day, not forgetting too all
the theories given out with authority concerning the nature of the
soul, the teachers of today cannot get beyond rather hazy and
abstract ideas of the connection between body and soul. There is
indeed no one engaged in teaching who will not be able to enter into
the feelings of thankfulness with which the teacher receives the
anthroposophical knowledge of man and learns to perceive, for example,
how the forces working in the child are transformed in the 7th year
of his age.
How before this period they work as psychic-spiritual
forces giving form and shape to the body, and how these moulding
processes come to a certain conclusion at the time of the change of
teeth, the forces being then set free from the bodily and able to
work in their own character as soul-forces, building up the life of
ideas and memory in the child. The teacher can now begin to make
observations of his own in this direction, to recognise through his
own perception the working of these moulding forces in the child, and
to make use of them — in the way, for instance, in which he
introduces the child to the art of writing. He works with confidence,
knowing he is working in the line of the child's development, not
against it.
The manner in which a child reacts to the lesson will be a matter of
no small interest to the teacher. Here is a child, for instance,
continually holding up his hand, joining in with intense keenness,
raising himself on his seat, glancing up with an expression of delight
on his face, pleased with everything all the time, whether because
he knows it already or because it is something he is eagerly wanting
to know. Here again is another, whose disposition finds a different
expression. After the teacher has finished and is passing on to a
fresh subject, or else the school hours are at an end, he quietly
leaves his seat, and approaching the teacher with earnest gaze asks
a question in a half whisper, relating to what the teacher has been
telling them, either wanting to carry the matter to a fuller completion,
or indicating something that puzzled him, that was not quite clear.
By such signs can we recognise the sanguine and the melancholic
respectively among our pupils.
Imagine a teacher standing up
before a large class of children, who are sitting all in confusion,
not according to any inner law, just as for the untrained eye the
stars stand arbitrarily in the heavens at night! How is he to
comprehend his class, how is he to set to work with such a crowd
of children so that each individual child may find his right place?
This difficulty it is that gives rise to the cry for small classes.
But it is for the teacher to carry out the task — and it is no
light task, and is only possible on the foundation of a spiritual
understanding of man — the task of so sounding the children
in the depths of their being as to be able to sort them out into
groups according to their peculiar temperaments. By this means order
and harmony are brought in, where before was confusion, and it is
then possible to conduct lessons in large classes; for as far as
the actual class instruction is concerned, instead of having to
handle a great number of particular children as so many individuals,
the teacher is able to handle particular groups of children whose
inner natures resemble one another.
Let us have an example of a group of children who are sitting quiet and good, but all
too inclined to do their work in a sleepy, uninterested fashion.
One can see among them pleasant round-faced, comfortable looking
little people, with smoothly brushed hair and an expression that
is thoroughly good-natured, if at times a trifle dull and slow.
The first thing to be done with them is to wake them up, they must
somehow or other be induced to listen and attend; one may even
resort, as it were in jest, to some such device as culling upon
them suddenly to pull their right ear with their left hand!
Another example is about a group of contented happy-go-lucky children, most of them
of slender and well-proportioned figure. They look about them in a
lively manner, and are fond of stealing a glance through the window
or a chat with the boy or girl sitting next them. They enjoy the
lesson and are all attention, but they enjoy just as well to have
their attention drawn away by something of no importance. Instinctively,
without hesitation, one would call upon these children to point out,
for example, on the map the line of march of Alexander the Great.
Pictures of Ionic and Doric pillars they looked at with interest;
they could give good descriptions of them, pointing out their
differences, and were delighted to make models of them in plasticine,
which they did with a fair measure of success. Their attention was
easily gained for everything that could be seen and looked at; in
this way one could meet their instinctive interest in the outside
world, and turn it to good purpose.
Thus can the child of every kind of temperament have his value in
the class; every kind is absolutely necessary in its place, every
kind completes the others, even leaves the others lagging helplessly
behind if it is wanting. It will be readily seen that this arranging
of the children according to inclination and talent will help very
greatly to the promotion of the right kind of social outlook.
Comentarii